Accesscontrol-re NPM

Access Control Re v3.1.0

A facade enhancing the great javascript Access Control, but with much desired missing features!

Features

Allowing custom Actions, beyond CRUD (create, read, update, delete) actions. You can have actions like like, follow, list, share, approve and anything your business domain requires. See https://github.com/onury/accesscontrol/issues/46
Allowing '*' for *Roles, *Actions and *Resources on IAccessInfo grants, a much needed feature (see https://github.com/onury/accesscontrol/issues/58)!
It is very powerful, but it can open security holes, so use with caution!
Using it you can define 'GOD'-like Roles:
```
// "GOD" can do any *Action on any *Resource!
{ 
  role: 'GOD', 
  resource: '*',
  action: '*:any'
}
```
This will actually grant GOD to any known Action against any known Resource.
Another scenario is to allow every *Role to access a particular Resource and/or Action:
```
// Any *Role can "look" any "openToAllResource"
{
  role: '*',
  resource: 'openToAllResource',
  action: 'look:any',
}
```
You can of course use any combination, even '*' for permit all :-)
In AccessControl, AccessControl.grant is NOT respecting denied: true of that IAccessInfo (see https://github.com/onury/accesscontrol/issues/67). AccessControlRe instead properly handles it they way someone would expect.
In AccessControl, accessControl.permission() throws an Error AccessControlError: Invalid role(s): [] when empty roles (eg a User with an empty roles: []) is passed in that IQueryInfo. AccessControlRe instead silently overcomes it (and returns a permission.granted === false). Reasoning is that an empty roles array foR the User, is something normal in the real world (eg a new user without any assigned roles).

How to use

    import { IAccessInfo, Permission } from 'accesscontrol';
    import { AccessControlRe } from 'accesscontrol-re';
    
    const accessInfos: IAccessInfo[] = [
      {
        role: 'user',
        resource: 'comment',
        action: 'list:any',
        attributes: ['*', '!secret'],
      },
    ];
    
    const acre = new AccessControlRe();
    acre.addAccessInfo(accessInfos);        // also accepts a single IAccessInfo
    acre.addAccessInfo(accessInfos);        // repeat as many times as needed
    acre.build();                           // call `build()` to start querying (only `_.once` per instance)!
    
    // the above can be done fluently in one statement
    const acre2 = new AccessControlRe(accessInfos).build();
    
    // From now on, you use `acre.permission()` - there is no need to use anything else from AccessControl :-)
    // It has the exact signature & usage as `accessControl.permission` (it delegates to it) and also returns a `Permission`
    const userPerm: Permission = acre.permission({
      role: 'user',
      resource: 'comment',
      action: 'list:own',
    });
    
    console.log('USER', userPerm.granted);

Caveats

Only the .grant(accessInfo: IAccessInfo) (implicitly and only through AccessControlRe::addAccessInfo(accessInfo: IAccessInfo)) and AccessControlRe::permission(queryInfo: IQueryInfo) are supported for now, not the chained fluent methods like createAny & updateOwn or the grantsObject etc of AccessControl. The upside of this is that you can do anything without those, and it is actually cleaner and easier to use and follow for DB or bulk creation & querying of permissions than the fluent ones.
There is some patching going on, as this is not a fork or reworked version of Access Control, just a facade. This is actually a very good point, cause Access Control version 2.x is just in peerdependencies so its updates on your local version will be picked up.
You need to create ALL your grants (i.e add all your addAccessInfo()) before you can use it & call .build() to retrieve an ActionControl instance with the grants locked. This is due to the way the '*' actions & resources actually work: the '*' is forcing all known actions / resources / roles to be created. Also you can call build() only _.once, it has no effect after that (use require-clean if you want a fresh instance :-).
@todo: .extend is disabled by design and is discouraged, for your own sake. Its evil to use while this is open https://github.com/onury/accesscontrol/issues/34#issuecomment-466387586 - when closed I'll happily add it :-)
Using '*' for Action, it grants access to all known Actions against the Resource, event if the Resource doesn't support some of these Actions. It shouldn't do any harm :-)
Order of addAccessInfo, matters!

Public API

constructor AccessControlRe(accessInfo?: IAccessInfo | IAccessInfo[])

Optionally pass an initial accessInfo to add to your instance.

addAccessInfo(accessInfo: IAccessInfo | IAccessInfo[]): AccessControlRe

Call it as many times as you want (but before calling .build()) to add new accessInfos to your instance.

At this point you still dont have an .accessControl instance (its null), nor you can call .permission() - you need to call .build() for this.

build(): AccessControlRe

You have to call it after you've finished adding ALL your accessInfos.

After calling .build() you CAN NOT call .addAccessInfo() again on that instance.

Internally, it creates the tweaked AccessControl instance (exposed as .accessControl) and you can start querying your permissions with accessControlRe.permission().

permission(queryInfo: IQueryInfo): Permission {

Works like AccessControl.permission() (see node_modules/accesscontrol/lib/AccessControl.d.ts) but solves the empty roles problem (and more in the future) so its preferred over AccessControl.permission()

getRoles(): string[]

Get all available roles (sorted).

getResources(): string[]

Get all available resources (sorted).

getActions(): string[]

Get all available actions (sorted).

accessControl: AccessControl

The AccessControl instance, should you need it.

Coming up

Custom Possessions (beyond 'any' & 'own') - completing https://github.com/onury/accesscontrol/issues/46
DONE: ~~Role '*' wildcard - scenarios like Any *Role can Visit the Homepage, eg role: '*'~~
Add some of Roles, Actions, Resources (or Possessions in the future), using negate wildcards, eg: action: ['*', '!drop_entity_table'].
If other goodies and Access Control issues solved via this facade seem important, they will get here!
DONE: ~~Refactor to a class~~
PRs, with tests + rationale, more than welcome :-)