Js-awe NPM | npm.io

js-awe

Awesome javascript utilities and extensions. Taking javascript to the next level. Including:

plan: New functional async style. Avoid await contamination
Chrono: Chrono time events and console.log using a visual charArt timeline.

npm install js-awe

Compatible with bun, web, CDN, import, require. To full guide on installation Go to Section

plan

Example

Simple declarative way to specify running functions sequencially or concurrently resulting in the below execution flow:

       |-> fun2A -> fun3-|
fun1 --|                 |-> fun5
       |-> fun2B -> fun4-|

const { plan } = require("js-awe")
 
let { fun1, fun2A, fun3, fun2B, fun4, fun5 } = exportDemoFunctions()
 
const myCalc = plan().build([
  fun1,                      
  [fun2A, fun3],
  [fun2B, fun4],
  fun5                  
])

myCalc(3).then(result => console.log(result)) //=> 17

// Just some simple functions to demonstrate the plan functionality
function exportDemoFunctions() {
  return { 
    fun1: val1 => Promise.resolve(val1 * 2),    // fun1: 3*2 = 6
    fun2A: val2 => val2 + 1,                    // fun2A: 6 + 1 = 7
    fun3: val3 => Promise.resolve(val3 + 3),    // fun3: 7 + 3 = 10
    fun2B: val2 => Promise.resolve(val2 - 1),   // fun2B: 6 - 1 = 5;
    fun4: val4 => val4 + 2,                     // fun4: 5 + 2 = 7
    fun5: ([val4, val5]) => val4 + val5,        // fun5: 10 + 7 = 17; Promise.resolve(17)
  }
}

New functional async style. Avoid await contamination

using plan, it pipes functions and forget if a function returns a promise or a real value. Next function always receives the real value.
Automatic control of error. Any return of type "Error" or "Promise.reject" will stop the execution of the pipe and return the error. There is no need to circuit break each function.
Define sequencial or concurrent execution through the use of array nesting. Pure javascript, no artifical syntax.

The libary handles the mixing of sync and async functions seamlessly

No need to handle errors in all functions.

Returning error or Promise.reject in a function will skip the rest of execution automatically. No need to throw exceptions.
Only add error handling when we want expressely to recover from the error at that point.

const { plan } = require('js-awe')
// import { plan } from 'js-awe'

const result = plan().build([
  (val1, val2) => 
    val2 !==0
      ? Promise.resolve(val1 / val2)
      : Promise.reject(new Error('Zero division')),
  val3 => {
    const result = Math.sqrt(val3 - 5)
    return Number.isNaN(result)
      ? new Error('Root of negative')
      : result
  } 
])

const handlingErrors = e => {
  if(e.message === 'Zero division') console.log('ooops divison by zero')
  if(e.message === 'Root of negative') console.log('ooops root of a negative value')
  if(e.message !== 'Zero division' && e.message !== 'Root of negative') console.log(e)
}

result(3, 0)
  .then(result => console.log(`result: ${result}`))
  // Error handling managed in one place
  .catch(handlingErrors)

result(4,2)
  .then(result => console.log(`result: ${result}`))
  .catch(handlingErrors)

The purpose:

Async await has done a lot to improve the readability of code when compared with callbacks style. But sometimes it is not a good construct, especially if you want to use it in a functional style!!!

plan tries to solve the problem of too many async await all spreads in a messy way around the code. It declares in just one point of your code the flow of execution, so you can work with pure functions that receives real values (no promises).

How many times you have experienced the problem of expecting real values and what you receive is a promise. How many times you solve this problem with an await making the code non performant as we end-up programming secuencially.

Every-time we use await, the execution flow split in two. If you spread await in different part of your code then it will create an execution flow in the shape of a tree. This means that you need to keep in your head and in sync a mental model for the data flow and a mental model of the execution flow. This makes the code difficult to reason about.

“plan” tries to solve this problem by declaring this tree explicitly in one place and in a simple elegant way. It uses array nesting to define this tree. It does not use weird DSL. “plan” is an execution planner that pipes functions to run in sequence and functions to run concurrently. It handles for you the promise chaining and data passing so you can write pure functions free of async await.

The construct to run in sequence:

[ fun1, fun2, fun3 ]

execution and data flow coincides:

fun1 -> fun2 -> fun3

* fun1 receives all the parameters when running the plan:
   plan().build(...)(param1, param2)
* fun2 receives output from fun1
* fun3 receives output from fun2

The construct to run concurrently:

[ fun1, [fun2], [fun3], fun4 ]

execution and data flow coincides:

       |-> fun2 --|
fun1 --|          |-> fun4
       |-> fun3 --|

* fun1 receives all the parameters when running the plan:
   plan().build(...)(param1, param2)
* fun2 receives output from fun1
* fun3 receives output from fun1
* fun4 receives an array that contains two values:
  [outputFromfun2, outputFromFun3]

The best thing is to view an example. First, we need to install it:

npm install js-awe

You can see below a more realistic example of its use. This could be part of an API to get the bank balances of all the holdings (savings and loans) for a specific customer:

import { plan } from 'js-awe'
// const { plan } = require('js-awe')

const getCustomerBalances = plan().build([
  fetchAccounts,
  [filterSavings, getSavingBalances],
  [filterLoans, getLoanBalances],
  format,
])

getCustomerBalances('0396d9b0').then(result => console.log('result: ', result))

Execution:

            |->filterSavings -> getSavingBalances -|
getAccounts-|                                      |-> format
            |->filterLoans   -> getLoanBalances   -|

The flow of data:

Return values from functions are passed to the next function to run, in a pipe-style way.
When the return value is a promise, the planner will wait for its resolution before calling the next function.

You can see the whole example here:

import { plan } from 'js-awe'
// const { plan } = require('js-awe')

const getCustomerBalances = plan().build([
  fetchAccounts,
  [filterSavings, getSavingBalances],
  [filterLoans, getLoanBalances],
  format,
])

getCustomerBalances('0396d9b0').then(result => console.log('result: ', result))

function filterSavings(accounts) {
  return accounts.filter((account) => account.type === 'saving')
}

function getSavingBalances(savingAccounts) {
  const listOfAcccountsToFetch = savingAccounts.map((account) => account.id)
  return fetchSavingBalances(listOfAcccountsToFetch)
}

function filterLoans(accounts) {
  return accounts.filter((account) => account.type === 'loan')
}
function getLoanBalances(loanAccounts) {
  const listOfAcccountsToFetch = loanAccounts.map((account) => account.id)
  return fetchLoanBalances(listOfAcccountsToFetch)
}

function format([savingBalances, loanBalances]) {
  return [...savingBalances, ...loanBalances]
}

// Data fetch services below are mocked just for demonstration to run locally.
// In production they should be fetch APIs of the real implementations that return promises.
function fetchAccounts(customerId) {
  return Promise.resolve([
    { id: 1, type: 'saving' },
    { id: 2, type: 'loan' },
  ])
}

function fetchSavingBalances(listOfAcccountsToFetch) {
  return Promise.resolve([
    {
      id: 1,
      type: 'saving',
      balance: 13,
    },
  ])
}

function fetchLoanBalances(listOfAcccountsToFetch) {
  return Promise.resolve([
    {
      id: 2,
      type: 'loan',
      balance: 24,
    },
  ])
}

The Plan utility is recommended when we have a complex tree, and you want to manifest explicitly this async flow. For example, This utility would be a good tool for an API that generates its response based on different calls to other APIs. Especially if some of the calls need to be called in sequence and others can be run concurrently.

When it is not recommended:

Simple async flows. Introducing another tool to learn may not be worth it.
Critical applications. It is not a contrasted solution with complex products using it in production.
You have the skills to do it better yourself: more flexible, readible and performance.
You are tired of new libraries, frameworks and abstractions. I get it!
You are happy with your current approach.

Chrono

Chrono time events and visualize them.

Spread in your Async code some:

chrono.time('step1')
chrono.timeEnd('step1')

And then chrono.report() to log the timeline and some stats.

Full example: chronoExample.js

chronoCreation :  2023-05-25T20:58:17.175Z
report :  2023-05-25T20:58:18.480Z

Timeline of events:
┌────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Events │ ms 0                                     650                             1186   1288  │
├────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ step1  │    |--------------------------------------|                                        || │
│ step2  │                                             |-------------------------------------|   │
│ step3  │                                              |-----------------------------|          │
└────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Total elapse Time of each event:
┌─────────┬─────────┬────────┬────────────┐
│ (index) │  name   │ elapse │ percentage │
├─────────┼─────────┼────────┼────────────┤
│    0    │ 'step1' │  650   │   36.81    │
│    1    │ 'step2' │  615   │   34.84    │
│    2    │ 'step3' │  501   │   28.36    │
└─────────┴─────────┴────────┴────────────┘

Coinciding Events timeline:
┌─────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────┬────────────┐
│ (index) │    runningEvents     │ elapseMs │ percentage │
├─────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────┼────────────┤
│    0    │     [ 'step1' ]      │   650    │   51.38    │
│    1    │     [ 'step2' ]      │   114    │    9.04    │
│    2    │ [ 'step2', 'step3' ] │   501    │   39.58    │
└─────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────┴────────────┘

And much more

For you to explore... Don't hesitate to explore the code: table.js, sanitizer.js, jsUtils.js...

Most of the functions has TS types. But more documentation will be needed. So if you want to help others:

please PULL REQUEST!!! with your changes.

build

npm run build

Run the test. If it fails cancel the build.
This will build for nodeJs in ./dist with support for Module Es in mjs folder and commonjs in cjs.
Build for web in dist/browser/js-awe.min.js
generate types and copy them to genTypes folder. see more details below

Generating types

The library offer typescript types in ./types/ for the consumer. Currently only the main functions are typed in detail.

To generate automatically a basic type definition (mainly all with generic any type) you can execute:

npm run genAndCopyTypes

This will output types in ./genTypes then it will copy the d.ts.map to ./types/ and d.ts files if they don't exist in ./types/. It is recommended to improve the automatic generation of types and to document with JsDoc.

publishing lib to npm

Change the version of the library in package.json version field. npm forces that each version published to have a unique version value.

npm publish

Installation

NodeJS:

npm install js-awe

supporting import (ES Modules) and require (commonjs)

import { plan } from 'js-awe'

const { plan } = require('js-awe')

100% compatible with bun:

bun install js-awe

Includes consoleTable([{a:1,b2},{a:2,b:3}]) an equivalent implementatation of node console.table() producing similar visualization.

Web:

Option 1: Grab the minified version at:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/josuamanuel/js-awe/main/dist/browser/js-awe.min.js

Then copy it in your project and work with it in your html:

...
<body>
  <script type="module">
    import { firstCapital } from './js-awe.min.js';

    const newDiv = document.createElement('div');
    newDiv.innerText = firstCapital('library is loaded correctly...');
    document.body.appendChild(newDiv);

  </script>
</body>
...

If you want to have types and IntelliSense support in your javascript files, grab file js-awe.min.dts and copy to the same folder as you copied js-awe-min.js:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/josuamanuel/js-awe/main/dist/browser/js-awe.min.d.ts

N.B.: vscode does not support IntelliSense inside html script tag, at least at current 1.82.1. So if you want to work with type support you will need to externalize your javascript code in an external file and add it to your html with <script type="module" src="filename.js"></script>

Option 2: CDN

...
<body>
  <script type="module">
    import { firstCapital } from 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/josuamanuel/js-awe/dist/browser/js-awe.min.js'

    const newDiv = document.createElement('div');
    newDiv.innerText = firstCapital('library is loaded correctly...');
    document.body.appendChild(newDiv);

  </script>
</body>
...