kwfpuscp2_44n v1.0.0

Wajiz Fi Ushul Fiqh Pdf 371

LINK ===== https://urllio.com/2tju0u

See the book by Ibn al-Rab'ay, Ibn al-Hashim, vol.2 p.46-47 for the Shafi’i position on how hadith is used to justify acts, and see the book Usul al-Fiqh al-Mufrada’i by Abd al-Rahman al-Munsif for a similar discussion.

9 This is the view of the Hanbali, Maliki and the explicit position of al-Shafii, see al-Zaydan, al-Wajiz, p.295 & Atif al-Zayn, Usul al-Fiqh al-Muyassar, p.229. The reason they argue is that there are plenty of texts to indicate this, see al-Ghazali, al-Mustasfa min Ilm al-Usul, Maktabah al-Tijariyyah, Cairo 1937, vol.1, p.83 & al-Amidi, al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam, ed. Abd al-Razzaq Afifi, 2nd edn, al-Maktab al-Islami, Beirut 1982, vol.4, p.211.

12 A Hanbali scholar by the name of al-Kharyani and another named as al-Bu’ini claim the Shaafi school at the intermediate level are al-Wahabi wa al-Fuqahah and Shafii respectively, see al-Zaydan, al-Wajiz, pp.296-297; al-Shawkani, Irshad al-Fuhul, p.9 & al-Mundhiri, al-Farid al-Akhbari, vol.3, p.169.

Al-Hafez argues that some scholars accept this only until they are faced with someone who argues against them based on hadith evidence, see al-Shawkani, Irshad al-Fuhul, p.9; al-Hafez, Farid u Ghayeb vol.3, p.224 & Madhab al-Fatima, Irshad al-Kafi fi sharh al-Ra’yi al-Ishtiwal al-Fiqhiyyah, ed. al-Qutb al-Shatibi, Dar al-Tali’ah al-Kutubiyyah, 2nd edn, Beirut 1974, vol.1, p.23. 84d34552a1