Parallel-future NPM

parallel-future

Run Futures in parallel

Example

const Task = require('data.task');
const parallel = require('parallel-future')(Task);


const parallelRequests = parallel([ getUsers, getPosts ]);

parallelRequests.fork(onRejected, (results) => {
  console.log('Users', results[0]);
  console.log('Posts', results[1]);
});

Why not `R.sequence(Task.of)`?

Because it only appears to run the Futures in parallel. Run the tests and see for your self.

  describe('runs parallel', () => {
    it('should run Futures in parallel', done => {
      console.time('parallel-future');
      parallel([ time(1)
               , time(2)
               , time(3)
               ]).fork(_, eventuallyEqual([1, 2, 3], () => { console.timeEnd('parallel-future'); done() }));
    });

    it('compared to R.sequence (only appears to be parallel)', done => {
      console.time('sequence');
      R.sequence(Task.of)
              ([ time(1)
               , time(2)
               , time(3)
               ]).fork(_, eventuallyEqual([1, 2, 3], () => { console.timeEnd('sequence'); done() }));
    });
  });

Output:

    runs parallel
parallel-future: 106ms
      ✓ should run Futures in parallel (106ms)
sequence: 315ms
      ✓ compared to R.sequence (only appears to be parallel) (316ms)