0.7.0 • Published 2 years ago

sidecar-webpack-plugin v0.7.0

Weekly downloads
-
License
MIT
Repository
github
Last release
2 years ago

Sidecar Webpack Plugin

This is a Webpack 5 plugin that leverages the use of Module federation (MF) with sensible conventions to easily provide and consume code in a way that is:

  1. sidecar-like: functionality of the sidecar packages is exposed in some "well defined" public API
  2. local first: prefers the npm installed implementation
  3. remote sidecar: leverages MF to load the code from a location defined at runtime

The problem of having an increasingly large code base is that our applications are usually managed by multiple teams. The agility of the team producing code in a large codebase is usually impacted unrelated parts of an applications are being considered by the build tools all the time.

Quick Start

Creating a sidecar Package

The sidecar package should have the following:

  1. a package.json that lists the entry point in its main field
  2. (upcoming feature) list out all the exported API in the package.json via the exports key to automatically fill out what is "exposed" for the underlying MF plugin
  3. a webpack.config.js that will turn the package into a remote bundle
  4. configure this sidecar package using a sidecar-webpack-plugin:

Sidecar package webpack.config.js

module.exports = {
  plugins: [
    new SidecarWebpackPlugin({
      // EXPOSES - may be removed later in favor of a convention based on "exports" key in package.json
      // * the same key as a MF plugin configuration
      // * point the "." (root) to the SOURCE of the entry point that would be 
      exposes: { ".": "./src/index.ts" },

      // SHARED
      // https://webpack.js.org/plugins/module-federation-plugin/#specify-package-versions
      // * the same key as a MF plugin configuration
      //   * for a sidecar that is always loaded dynamically, make sure to list out most of your shared deps to get good "tree shaking" at the package granularity level
      //   * for sidecar that are mostly for development purposes, make sure to at least list out all your deps that require "singleton" key to avoid runtime errors
      shared: {
        react: {
          requiredVersion: ">16.0.0",
          singleton: true
        }
      }
    }),
  ],
};

Sidecar package entry

Your sidecar package entry point should only be exporting what are your public API for the package.

NOTE: In this package's initial implementation, the public API is expected to be exposed through the entry point of the "main" or "module" field of a package.json. In the near future, this plugin will suppor the "exports" field as well.

Here's an example:

export { getName } from "./getName";
export { ExampleLibComponent } from "./ExampleLibComponent";
export * as all from './all';

Configuring host to accept sidecar

Modify the webpack.config.js to add this plugin

module.exports = {
  plugins: [
    new SidecarWebpackPlugin({
      // REMOTES
      // * different than MF, remotes are named by their sidecar package name only
      remotes: ["example-lib"],

      // SHARED
      // https://webpack.js.org/plugins/module-federation-plugin/#specify-package-versions
      // * the same key as a MF plugin configuration
      //   * for a sidecar that is always loaded dynamically, make sure to list out most of your shared deps to get good "tree shaking" at the package granularity level
      //   * for sidecar that are mostly for development purposes, make sure to at least list out all your deps that require "singleton" key to avoid runtime errors
      shared: {
        react: {
          singleton: true,
          requiredVersion: "^17.0.0",
        },
      },
    }),
  ],
};

Discussion of Sidecar, Microfrontend, and Module Federation

These are all related terms. It is important to note that none of these terms are truly mutually exclusive. We are mainly comparing the actual technology below.

Is it Micro-Frontend?

The frontend community has been rallying behind an architectural pattern called microfrontend. This has the advantage of allowing the individual team to develop and deploy their own function at will.

The drawback of the above mentioned method is that it forces the use of custom elements to achieve micro frontends. Custom elements themselves did not support a load mechanism at all. Further, it means that duplicated dependencies are going to be present on the page.

Pros:

  • all modern browsers now support this standard
  • the architectural pattern is very valid in addressing developer team agility

Cons:

  • the DOM has limited semantics in addressing a micro frontend architecture
  • no provided script loading mechanism
  • no provided way to express shared dependencies

Is it Module Federation?

Module federation is created to address some of the drawbacks above. The main drawback of using it as presented in the documentation is that all federated remotes are required to be known at build time.

Sidecar Webpack Plugin seeks to leverage MF while providing a way to override the remote entry point URL at run time. Adopting MF is not a all or nothing approach. Much of the MF documentation focuses on the dynamism in loading remotes at runtime.

Pros:

  • script loading is provided by the bundler
  • independent of running environment (browser implementations or even node.js)

Author's opinion: to achieve the best tree shaking and deduplication, we should continue bundling with all npm packages for production. Sidecar Webpack Plugin pairs well in this case for a remote provider to only use it for inner loop develop against a deployed preview host URL that has the Sidecar Webpack Plugin enabled.

Contributing

How to test this out?

yarn
yarn build
yarn start
0.7.0

2 years ago

0.6.1

2 years ago

0.6.0

2 years ago

0.5.0

2 years ago

0.4.0

2 years ago

0.3.0

2 years ago

0.2.0

2 years ago

0.1.0

2 years ago