1.4.18 • Published 9 years ago

spritzjs v1.4.18

Weekly downloads
2
License
MIT
Repository
github
Last release
9 years ago

spritzjs

A Spritz stream-cipher implementation in JavaScript

Created with reference to "Spritz - a spongy RC4-like stream cipher and hash function" by Ronald L. Rivest and Jacob C. N. Schuldt on 2014.10.27

Intent

Provide a literal JavaScript reference implementation from the excellent pseudo-code created by Rivest and Schuldt; allowing the reader to follow the Paper with this code serving as an accompaniment. To this end, variable/parameter names and their casing have been preserved, however the function names have been camelCased for JS convention.

It is hoped this may serve as a starting point for those who wish to explore this cipher in a JS context.

The main source file (spritzjs.js) is deliberately unoptimized with the aim of readability, yet is relatively portable. (For example, "isArray" support is assumed rather than feature-detected, and may need replacing if you wish to run this on IE8- or very old Firefox versions. See: http://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es5/#Array.isArray)

Tested in: Node.js (0.10.26+), Chrome (38+), Firefox (33+)

References:

Installation

Node.js

npm install spritzjs

cd spritzjs

npm install
Run tests
npm test

Browser

<script src="spritzjs.js"></script>

Usage

var spritzjs = require('spritzjs')();

or in the browser:

var spritzjs = window.spritzjs();

then:

hash

var M = [65, 66, 67];             // "ABC" as a byte array
var r = 32;                       // 32 byte hash desired

var hashed = spritzjs.hash(M, r); // "hashed" now contains 32 bytes of hashed "M" material

console.log(hashed.length);       // -> 32
console.log(hashed);              // -> [2, 143, 162,..., 71]

encrypt/decrypt

var K = [115, 101, 116, 101, 99, 45, 97, 115, 116, 114, 111, 110, 111, 109, 121];
var M = [84, 104, 97, 110, 107, 32, 121, 111, 117, 32, 102, 111, 114, 32, 100, 101, 99, 111, 100, 105, 110, 103, 32, 116, 104, 105, 115, 32, 112, 108, 97, 105, 110, 116, 101, 120, 116, 32, 97, 116, 32, 108, 101, 97, 115, 116, 44, 32, 73, 32, 104, 111, 112, 101, 32, 121, 111, 117, 32, 119, 105, 108, 108, 32, 116, 114, 121, 32, 115, 112, 114, 105, 116, 122, 106, 115, 33];

var encrypted = spritzjs.encrypt(K, M);       // "encrypted" now contains ciphertext C

console.log(encrypted.length === M.length);   // -> true
console.log(encrypted);	                      // -> [27, 217, 247,..., 165]

var decrypted = spritzjs.decrypt(K, encrypted);

for (var i = 0; i < decrypted.length; i++) {
	if (M[i] !== decrypted[i]) throw new Error("I shouldn't be thrown");
}

Contributors

  • Jonathan Grande (example implementations for the missing functions... coming soon)
  • Devin Weaver (suggestions for spritzjs uptake)

Other (known) Implementations

These repositories also exist, it would be good to ensure all implementations pass the same verified vectors and/or assertions where relevant. Read each one to judge for yourself!

NB. @repository owner: Please raise an issue, mail me, or create a pull-request of this README.md to remove your repository from this list if so desired:

TODO

  • Reinstate the unit-tests - spritzjs was developed in a TDD manner using testem, jasmine and a bunch of other stuff that doesn't need to be here so the tests will be added with a lighter test-harness (probably tape)
  • Code - complete the basic API with encrypt/decrypt etc
  • Usage - hashing and encrypt/decrypt example now included
  • Code - add the remaining functions "aead" (and "adad")
  • Threat Modeling - THREAT.md? "this cipher should not be used until pounded on by cryptanalysts" etc
  • Build - browserify is awesome but we want to have the smallest footprint and are not using Node.js specific functionality. Consider js(l|h)int for ensuring correctness of the clean-source version
  • Modularise - stop tests and code getting monolithic. split into core and an opt-in API. We should separate cryptanalytical test-vectors from unit-tests. Ideally we could share the same verified test vector corpus amongst any implementation, regardless of language?
  • Performance - measure performance before optimising, crypto-bench fork?
  • Optimisation - there are quick-wins available (such as the obvious N=256 and removal of "gcd"). what about asm.js/SIMD can we use anything here?
  • Minification - once hand-optimised, let the uglification begin, when tests are in good shape, we could "golf" some interesting solutions and variants, not to mention trivial pure-functional versions
  • Test vectors - more test-vectors needed! The paper only provided a handful (all are implemented in test/spritzjs-tests.js)
  • Cryptanalysis - should be ready to use as is, though there may be faster implementations
  • uC - port to microcontrollers, specifically 8-bit ones? tessle? IoT? Arduino/AVR/PIC? Even if straight-ported implementation code is not useful depending on the target architecture, we should be able to share the accumulated test-vectors and some ideas from the imperative low-footprint variants
  • Adoption - consider options for including spritzjs in other projects if the cipher is proved sound, Node.js crypto core and crypto-browserify etc.
  • Peer-review - please

For more information you can find the latest README.md, tests and other versions at:

- therealjampers 2014

1.4.18

9 years ago

1.4.17

9 years ago

1.3.16

9 years ago

1.3.15

10 years ago

0.3.14

10 years ago

0.1.10

10 years ago

0.1.9

10 years ago

0.1.8

10 years ago

0.1.7

10 years ago

0.1.6

10 years ago

0.1.5

10 years ago

0.0.4

10 years ago

0.0.3

10 years ago

0.0.2

10 years ago

0.0.1

10 years ago