1.0.5 • Published 10 months ago

subh-oauth2 v1.0.5

Weekly downloads
-
License
MIT
Repository
github
Last release
10 months ago

subh-oauth2

A Simple Oauth Client Library

Installation

npm i subh-oauth2

Specifications

This lib exposes these methods:

startAuthFlow(client: OAuthClient): string // Returns the authorization URL
handleCallback(client: OAuthClient, callbackParams: object): Promise<TokenResponse>
refreshToken(client: OAuthClient, refreshToken: string): Promise<TokenResponse>

Client Side Usage

In client-side use, do NOT put <client-secret>, using PKCE is recommended ( some provider forces to use ).

Sample OAuthClient Setup:

let client = {
    authorizationUrl: "", // Authorization URL
    clientId: "", // Client ID of Oauth provider
    scopes: ["scope1", "scope2", "scope3"], // Scopes
    tokenUrl: "", // URL fot receiving token from 'code'
    redirect_uri: "", // URL of your app where Oauth provider would redirect after login ( remember to put this is Oauth Provider Settings )
    state: "", // Ramdom string to be matched with parameter 'state' of callback URL
    pkce: {
        code_verifier: "", // generated code verifier
        code_challenge: "", // generated code challenge from code verifier
        code_challenge_method: "", // 'S256' or 'plain'
    }
};

Implicit Flow

In client-side use, we can use implicit flow, where access_token is shared directly, but NOT recommended.

Sample OAuthClient Setup:

let client = {
    authorizationUrl: "", // Authorization URL
    clientId: "", // Client ID of Oauth provider
    scopes: ["scope1", "scope2", "scope3"], // Scopes
    tokenUrl: "", // URL fot receiving token from 'code'
    redirect_uri: "", // URL of your app where Oauth provider would redirect after login ( remember to put this is Oauth Provider Settings )
    state: "", // Ramdom string to be matched with parameter 'state' of callback URL
    response_type: "token" // to get access_token directly
};

Server Side Usage

In server-side use, we should put <client-secret>, store it properly in ENV so that it does NOT get exposed in public. PKCE should be used for better security, although it has provision to skip.

Sample OAuthClient Setup:

let client = {
    authorizationUrl: "", // Authorization URL
    clientId: "", // Client ID of Oauth provider
    clientSecret: "", // Client Secret of Oauth provider
    scopes: ["scope1", "scope2", "scope3"], // Scopes
    tokenUrl: "", // URL fot receiving token from 'code'
    redirect_uri: "", // URL of your app where Oauth provider would redirect after login ( remember to put this is Oauth Provider Settings )
    state: "", // Ramdom string to be matched with parameter 'state' of callback URL
    pkce: {
        code_verifier: "", // generated code verifier
        code_challenge: "", // generated code challenge from code verifier
        code_challenge_method: "", // 'S256' or 'plain'
    }
};

Lib Support

  • Workes with Auth0, Kinde Oauth Provider Tested

  • Workes on both Server and Client Side JS Tested

Example

For better understanding, go through the /example.

  • example2 is a NextJS 14 Server Side Implementation

Live Demo: https://subh-oauth2-demo2.vercel.app

Implementation Choices and Challenges

I created an OAuth2 client JavaScript library that works on both server-side and client-side environments. I decided to use the Proof Key for Code Exchange (PKCE) flow to improve security, especially for public clients.

  • Challenges I Faced:

    Documentation Issues: Working with identity providers like Kinde and Auth0 was tough because their docs focus more on SDKs. This made it hard to find the information I needed for API integration, so I spent a lot of time figuring things out.

  • Client-Side Crypto Problems:

    I ran into issues with the crypto library on the client side, which caused problems when trying to generate the code_challenge. I had to look for other libraries to handle this securely.

  • Tricky OAuth2 API Calls:

    Making the OAuth2 API calls was complicated, especially without a clear setup. I got a lot of errors, and the messages were often confusing, making it hard to troubleshoot. Also understanding the oauth flow was tricky.

Overall, these challenges pushed me to dig deeper into the resources and find better ways to implement the OAuth2 client library.

1.0.5

10 months ago

1.0.4

10 months ago

1.0.3

10 months ago

1.0.2

10 months ago

1.0.1

10 months ago

1.0.0

10 months ago