mlok v0.1.5

🦎 Mlok

TypeScript mocking library focused on simplicity and testing DX

Getting started

npm i -D mlok

import mlok from 'mlok'

const catRepositoryMock = mlok<CatRepository>()

This package is native ESM and does not provide a CommonJS export. If your project uses CommonJS, you will have to convert to ESM or use the dynamic import() function.

Motivation

Some things are difficult to mock. This difficulty often arises due to poor design on our part, but there are also cases where we have limited control over it, such as with frameworks or other third-party library APIs. So, how is such code tested?

1. It's not Often a pragmatic solution, ideally applied only to the residue of code that is no longer logically reducable or splittable.
2. Uses real thing in an integration test This approach works well in certain situations, such as when running tests against a dockerized database or a sandboxed service environment. However, it's not always available or efficient and test performance becomes an issue when overused.
3. Write a complex mock and a unit test Requires lot of effort and resulting mocks are usually highly coupled with the implementation.

While unit tests are not the only type of testing to do, it should be the easiest. Mlok enables you to write mocks for complex inputs (like Request object, database connection, SDK instance) with the same ease as passing in a number or string. Stop worrying about creating mocks that "don't crash", focus on the behavior specific to your tests. Stop saying something is not tested, because...

Example

In the simple snippet an AuthenticationService gets a UserRepository injected. Then it is able to provide a User from the repository based on the bearer token provided from the HTTP request from the Nest.js-like context.

export class AuthenticationService {
  constructor(private readonly userRepository: UserRepository) {}

  public async authenticate(ctx: ExecutionContext): Promise<User | null> {
    const token = this.extractJWT(ctx)
    if (!token) {
      return null
    }
    return this.userRepository.getUserByToken(token)
  }

  private extractJWT(ctx: ExecutionContext): string | null {
    const [, token] =
      ctx
        .switchToHttp()
        .getRequest()
        .headers.authorization?.toString()
        ?.match(/bearer (.*)/i) ?? []
    return token ?? null
  }
}

Let's write a small test: When request sends bearer token foo, user is retrieved by the token. It does not test all the logic, but it focuses on the token extraction and communication with the repository. Let's implement the tests in Jest.

Jest

it('Jest', async () => {
  const ctx: ExecutionContext = {
    switchToHttp: () => ({
      getRequest: () =>
        ({ headers: { authorization: 'Bearer foo' } } as IncomingMessage),
    }),
  }
  const userRepository: UserRepository = {
    getUserById: jest.fn<any>(),
    getUserByToken: jest.fn<any>(),
  }
  await new AuthenticationService(userRepository).authenticate(ctx)
  expect(userRepository.getUserByToken).toHaveBeenCalledWith('foo')
})

• 💔 Lot of explicit code needs to be implemented "not to crash" (ctx needs to return object with callable switchToHttp, needs to return object with callable getRequest, which needs to have property headers).

• 🙈 For rich interfaces, we need to either cast type (as IncomingMessage) or implement the whole behavior (UserRepository).

Jest with Mlok

it('Mlok', async () => {
  const userRepository = mlok<UserRepository>()
  const ctx = mlok<ExecutionContext>().override({ authorization: 'Bearer foo' })
  await new AuthenticationService(userRepository).authenticate(ctx)
  expect(userRepository.getUserByToken).toHaveBeenCalledWith('foo')
})

• 💚 Mock does not fail on default, all you need is mlok<T>(), no need to implement whole interface nor type cast
• ✅ Focus on what you need to test

Goals

• 💪 Allow developers to unit tests any contract-designed API with zero mocking effort
• ✅ Require developers to define only what they need to test, never what they need to create a valid mock
• 🔁 Integrate easily with existing toolchain (testing & assertion frameworks)

TODO

• npm + GitHub metadata, keywords etc
• docs pages?
• Examples and DX comparison
• function override
• scalar override
• Strict override API
• collision API
• README
• Sinon API / comparison
• Jest + Vitest battery test
• Fix test suites for Vitest<=0.20 & Jest <= 24 (probably not issue of functionality)